The first image of the type on the wall describing the “Balenciaga” exhibition was interesting to me because of the type class that I’m taking. In this class we have lately been focusing on kerning and letter spacing. Before I had started taking this class i would have not taken as much notice of this. but the letter spaces and font used was very well-chosen and places on the wall with a non centered block of text. The next image is an image from another exhibition. This sparked my interest because I know there is use of manipulation sed to make this photograph because Cindy takes her own photos of herself and there are four different profiles of Cindy in this one photo also with a background of like a black grunge. The only thing I think is weird about this image but could also be clever is the way that 2 of the profiles are wearing the same top. I enjoy manipulation of photos so this was good to see.
These photographs by Cindy Sherman in her exhibition of “Clowns” was new to me as I had never seen photographs like that. I am more into manipulation in photography compared to this style but it amazed me how Cindy Sherman’s work was all done by her and all the photographs were taken through a mirror. It would have been very challenging for her to do it all on her own but she did a fantastic job. It opened my eyes to a new side of photography that i was never really interested in.
I showed up an hour late because I got the times wrong so I walked into the auditorium unsure on why everyone was already there and the lady was already speaking. I didn’t know anything about Cindy Sherman’s work because I had never looked into it. As I was listening to the lecture and taking notes and looking at the images. The first image shown of “Clowns” captured my attention. I am not a big fan of Art and galleries, but to see a photographer that does everything for herself and has an out there idea of something like clowns fascinated me. I was very interested to see what other work Cindy had done as I didn’t look through the gallery before the lecture.
Point One: Photography – The way photography has changed since the first photo was taken and the amount of photos that have been taken since then. for example “As early as 1930, an estimated one billion photographs were being taken every year worldwide. Fifty years later, it was about 25 billion a year still being taken on film. By 2012 we were taking 380 billion photographs a year, nearly all digital. One trillion photographs were taken in 2014. some 3.4 trillion photographs taken in existence in 2011.”(How to See the World – Nicholas Mirzoeff Introduction page 6) Over the years from 1930 until now, not only has the way photographs have been taken changed, but how many photographs are taken has increased dramatically because if new technology.
Point Two: The way we See the world – The world has changed so much over time. from the quality of air, the pollution in the world and scientific knowledge. “The planet itself is changing before our eyes, In 2013, carbon dioxide passed the signature threshold of 400 parts per million in the atmosphere for the first time since the Pliocene era about 3 to 5 million years ago. Although we cannot see the gas, it has set in motion catastrophic change. With more carbon dioxide, warm air holds more water vapor. As the ice-caps melt, there is more water in the ocean. As the ocean is warm, there is more energy for a storm system to draw on to produce storm after ‘unprecedented’ storm.”( How to See the World – Nicholas Mirzoeff Introduction page 6 and 7) Pollution, especially air pollution has changed the world significantly. As the world changes over time with new technology being made and cars burning fuels into the atmosphere it creates bad air and in some places like China, a smog covering the city.
Point Three: The way we see art – The way we see art nowadays is so different that in was in the 1990’s. “The difference between the concept of visual culture in 1990 and the one we have today is the difference between seeing something in a specific viewing space, such as a museum or cinema, and the image-dominated network society. In 1990, you had to go to a cinema to see films (except reruns on TV), to an art gallery to see art, or visit someones house to see their photographs. Now of course we do all that online and moreover, whenever we happen to choose to do so.” (How to See the World – Nicholas Mirzoeff page 12 and 13) The way art in viewed now is generally all internet based. Even now, libraries are nowhere near as popular and they used to be because the internet is full of everything we need to know and is easier to find than reading a book is. Art Galleries are portrayed with art that is pure and visible as actual size rather than being on tiny screen. the colors are shows so much better and the reality of the art in the image you are seeing itself is so much clearer and polished in real life. whereas in the earlier years there was no internet to find all these images. You had to go and find it yourself.
I Love this image because its very visually eye catching. the use of color ans the different size of type and the fonts used make it interesting to look at and there is a lot to take in of the image. It is also very well done by the fact that you can see the outlines of the face just by using text to make it a persons face. Usually in these kinds of images, the artist is trying to send a message.
I find Bauhaus to be a very interesting genre of design. This poster made in 1923, shows the bold solid shapes and the very small amount of color used with a bright bold color to highlight the image. The font of the word “Bauhaus” and “graphics now” are in the same font that is a little different to a normal font like the other type on the poster. The use of bold color in the ratio to the darker colors make the type easy to read.
This blog is designed for my studies at Massey University in the Bachelor of Design program.